Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 September 10
September 10[edit]
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 10, 2010
List of regions of Scotland[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. Editors are encouraged to be bold and fix this problem through regular editing and discussion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:52, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- List of regions of Scotland → Scottish Parliament constituencies and regions (links to redirect • history • stats)
Delete as a misleading redirect; the target article is not a list of regions, and does not contain such a list. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Restore disambiguation, expand, and move Regions of Scotland over - this was a disamb page which was only redirected yesterday, here. Though converting to a redirect with a hatnote accords with the guidelines, there isn't a primary topic so it works better as a disambiguation page. I am proposing to restore the original version but add Subdivisions of Scotland. I would then move Regions of Scotland over the recreated disamb page as a better title. This will preserve the history whilst making a useful page. The existing redirect, which is established, should be kept to avoid breaking links from external sites. I don't think we need to get too hung up over whether the resulting page is strictly a 'List of' - the disamb page thus created would be helpful and relevant to searchers and that is the acid test. I have notified the redirect creator. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Retarget to whichever article actually contains a list of regions. If the target page contains no such list, then it shouldn't be a topic on a disambig page either, meaning there is nothing to disambiguate. It seems fairly straightforward to me that if we don't have an actual list, then we should. bd2412 T 14:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Lucille and Other Classics[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-notable album, not mentioned in target. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - this was not mentioned in the target because the nominator removed it from the target 2 minutes before he nominated it - here! I have restored it to the target - better for the editors of the page to decide which albums are included. This redirect was created following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucille and Other Classics, which was initiated by the nominator. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Matsuyama Airi[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The name is of an actress who portrayed a character in a production of the series, not an actual character in the show. Also the actress herself is not notable. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - doubly confusing since her name is actually Airi Matsuyama! Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bridge: Japanese names can be written in original Japanese order (Matsuyama Airi) or in Western order (Airi Matsuyama). "Airi Matsuyama" was already deleted, but "Matsuyama Airi" has not yet been deleted. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)