Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 3, 2010

Union Générale Cinématographique[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the article on the company itself is not created yet, and the redirect very confusingly links to User generated content via the UGC abbreviation redirect. Deinocheirus (talk) 15:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Andrew Conley[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete recent AfD showed no consensus for redirect on the grounds that Dexter may be responsible for encouraging Conley's as a murderer. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Conley. LibStar (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - this guy is mentioned in the target so I see no reason to delete which would make the content harder to find. A redirect is simply a search aid and the existence of the redirect does not imply support for the material at the target - see WP:RNEUTRAL. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - No reason for deletion, redirect is the better option.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per my arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Conley (2nd nomination), where perhaps if the nom participated in the discussion, it would've been clear that his argument has no grounds. Not sure why nom is trying so hard to get this deleted. Either he really believes I cheated the first AfD somehow or is just blindly following process for process' sake. -- œ™ 00:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_November_3&oldid=762046998"