Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 May 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 9, 2010

Template:Euro birth date and age[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary "Euro" before template's name! Magioladitis (talk) 15:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, this is the old title of the template and was used on 1000s of pages. If it is deleted, when anyone goes and looks at the history of a page there will be a dead link where this template appeared. --Philip Stevens (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By checking the history I see that "Euro ..." that was deleted and redirected to the original template instead of just deleted, probably because of a few uses it has back in 2006. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's correct, but it was more than a few uses. Every serving UK MP was linked to it. --Philip Stevens (talk) 12:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And why to keep the redirect then? The edit history of the template is already deleted. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Taelus (Talk) 19:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep—this template redirect is harmless and will help historic revisions of pages appear correctly. –Grondemar
  • Keep - Harmless really. Deleting it'll do—slightly—more harm than good, per Philip Stevens, Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 10:11, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Geddyl alcohol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Fatty alcohol per Bridgeplayer. Straightforward. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two different chemicals, with different molecular formulae. One is an alcohol and the other is a carboxylic acid. While they are closely related, this is not sufficient grounds for a redirect from one to this other, which only causes confusion. Stubify or delete, I don't care which. Ephemeronium (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Fatty alcohol where it is described. In truth, such straightforward retargetting could simply be carried out as an editorial action. Only if such a retargetting is resisted do we need a discussion, here. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_May_9&oldid=1141906645"