Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 June 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 14, 2010

Template:Wookieepedia box[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, thus retained by default. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggests that the template is a box, whereas it actually is an external link, thus misleading. Unused, so deletion should be unproblematic. The Evil IP address (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - contains a significant page history so should be kept per WP:RFD#KEEP. Better to take this to TFD for a decision on the underlying page rather than deleting it by proxy. Though it is admittedly only used on a handful of pages, it is not unused as stated in the nomination and deletion would produce red links. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • We could still move it to a talk page subpage, but it should definitely not remain under this title since it confuses. --The Evil IP address (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move (without redirect) to an appropriate page, probably a subpage of the talk page of the target. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Arthur Rubin's most helpful suggestion deals with the history. However, we are still left with two issues. Firstly, this was kept at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 May 31. Deleting a template by proxy by deleting a redirect remains a poor option, particularly where it has been kept at XFD; secondly, deletion is going to leave a bundle of red links. I accept that the title is potentially misleading but since it will not be added to future pages that is not a practical issue. In my view, the correct course of action is to return the underlying template to TFD. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, there's nothing against this template at all, just the redirect. And the links are solely on some talk page archives, not a big deal. --The Evil IP address (talk) 09:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, a since-orphaned improperly named redirect. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

City of Bogo, Cebu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (Talk) 10:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Bogo City redirected to Bogo, Cebu when city got demoted. Supreme Court reverted demotion; someone created a new article City of Bogo, Cebu instead of using the old redirected article name. francis17 04:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep - very substantial page history. The stats show this is a plausible search term. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unofficial name.58.71.79.8 (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)— 58.71.79.8 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Keep Harmless if not plausible search term with substantial pageviews (which admittedly might be because 3 pages link to the redirect). --Mkativerata (talk) 08:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

City of Carcar, Cebu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (Talk) 10:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Carcar City redirected to Carcar, Cebu when city got demoted. Supreme Court reverted demotion; someone created a new article City of Carcar, Cebu instead of using the old redirected article name. francis17 04:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Dakbayan sa Naga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (Talk) 10:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cebuano language name of Naga City, Cebu. Name is included in article no need to created a separate article of the name which was only a redirect to the Naga City, Cebu. francis17 04:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_14&oldid=1074688260"