Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 January 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 31, 2010

Arrondissements and communes of haiti[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retargeted per consensus (non-admin close). B.Wind (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There exists an article called Arrondissements of Haiti, so these two redirects are not appropriate. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Salvador Escudero III[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete, red links have been left behind to encourage article creation. --Taelus (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salvador III is Francis' father, and the father was quite a notable person, but his article shouldn't redirect to his son's article. This will be confusing in cases such as this. –Howard the Duck 07:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wikify target, delete nominated redirect, and list at WP:requested articles. The problem here is twofold: the target has no internal links (and only one external one), and if the Salvador Escudero III meets WP:BIO (which appears to be the case), he should be a subject of his own standalone article. A redlink in the current article and mentions at Requested articles and Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines would encourage article creation should it be as appropriate as it appears to me. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I could create an article, but probably later. Until then, the redirect must be deleted. –Howard the Duck 06:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Warrior Cats by Erin Hunter (the main stars)[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not used, not linked to, implausible serach term. Brambleclawx 23:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a very highly unlikely search item/typo. The original article is duplicated and cited in the target article; so nothing significant would be lost save the acknowledgment of two edits by an eleven-year-old (according to her userpage) editor. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_31&oldid=1148046411"