Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 January 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 17, 2010

Www.bbc.co.uk/nature/programmes/tv/wildnewworld[edit]

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. NW (Talk) 00:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are not needed from URLs of external organisations. mattbr 10:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was a mistake on my part. FunkMonk (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By calling the redirect a mistake are you saying that we want this to be deleted. I ask since if you as the page creator wants the page deleted and if there are no other major contributors (adding the deletion tag does not count) the page can then be speedy deleted.--76.69.164.121 (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. FunkMonk (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. URLs are not appropriate article titles Me Three (talk to me) 21:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Institue for Theological Zoology[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Created last December as the result of moving a misspelled new page. Not a useful redirect to leave in place.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Misspelling in creation of page, but not a likely misspelling for someone searching for the article Me Three (talk to me) 21:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep clearly a likely misspelling as it was created misspelled before being moved. Josh Parris 13:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a random typo, not a likely one (in a month when Institute received 5,080 pageviews, "Institue" received only 8 hits). A single occurrence does not indicate likeliness, and the move history is preserved in the page history of the target article. –Black Falcon (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Flora Stone Mather Memorial Hall[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is misleading, because the Mather Memorial Building and Mather House are different structures. - Eureka Lott 06:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Cum fart[edit]

The result of the discussion was retarget to Creampie (sexual act). Jafeluv (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for R3 as an implausible search term, but cleared R3 due to recency. I still contend that this is an implausible search term, however, and therefore it is ready for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Uncyclopedia, the content free encyclopedia[edit]

The result of the discussion was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The search engine will already suggest Uncyclopedia without typing this in, pointless redirect. Otterathome (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, harmless {{R from alternative name}}. —Кузьма討論 06:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete, but not per nom. While the redirect does not appear to be used much (only 5–15 pageviews per month), it is not implausible; however, it is missing a dash. So, delete the nominated redirect, create Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia instead, and tag it as {{R from alternative name}}. –Black Falcon (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. As the "official" name (with tagline), it seems to be a plausible search term. I'd keep, and also create the redirect (with hyphen) as above. Most Wiki articles with a hyphen in the title also exist as a redirect without one, since they are likely to be omitted by someone typing in the search box. Me Three (talk to me) 21:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a valid alternative name. Tagged. Josh Parris 12:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_17&oldid=1148682829"