Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 April 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 13, 2010

Va'ad HaRabbonim of Lakewood[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete as unopposed nomination. ~ Amory (utc) 21:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page should be deleted. There is no such organization as Va'ad HaRabbonim of Lakewood. Jms2000 (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I combined these three nominations as the same decision will obviously apply to all. ~ mazca talk 10:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:PAP[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Amory (utc) 21:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect into user space. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, the only cross-namespace redirects that cause problems tend to be the ones coming out of article space. There's never historically been any issue with WP-space shortcuts to userspace essays. ~ mazca talk 10:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Respawn Entertainment[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close - redirect was overwritten with an article that has since been nominated for AfD. This is no longer within the purview of RfD (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to see link between Respawn Entertainment and Infinity Ward#Dismissal_of_senior_employees. Respawn Entertainment was speedy deleted yesterday and think the redirect should also be speedy but none of the cats. fits. Codf1977 (talk) 06:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Respawn Entertainment was the ultimate result of the subject in question (West and Zampella founded Respawn Entertainment as a direct consequence of their dismissal) . I thought some coverage on the subject was necessary, anyway, if not a full article, then at the very least, a redirect to a relevant subject. - Plastic Fish (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Respawn Entertainment is a company now. There should not be a "redirect".

Yeah what's up w/ this, a new company getting redirected to an old one? Some editor failed.

  • Close: overtaken by events. This is no longer a redirect, but an article which is currently subject to a vote for deletion. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.