Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 April 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other actions on April 1, 2010

SEND_(disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted per G7 - Creator requests deletion. --Taelus (talk) 23:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

suggest deletion. I put this page in before I realized there was already a SEND page. The original SEND page was a redirection to one meaning of the term. I edited the SEND page to become a disambiguation page and then made the "SEND (disambiguation)" page a REDIRECT. It is no longer needed. Chickacha (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

USA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was April fool's. Thryduulf (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest deletion. Shortcut-like redirect. Redirects like this may lead to reduce in efficiency of Wikipedians, as suggested by Fu (2010).[1]

References[edit]
  1. ^ Fu, April. "Shortcut-like redirects". In A. N. Idiot (ed.). A Study of Shortcuts on Wikipedia. Vol. XIII (13th ed.). Worldwide. pp. 4p-r11, f001. ISBN 1234567890123. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid prefix (help)
Kayau Voting IS evil 09:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Emphatic keep and close - by far the most common use of "USA" worldwide is as an abbreviation for the country's name. This appears to be a violation of WP:POINT, particularly in light of today's date and the fake ISBN and citation. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.