Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 June 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 30[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 30, 2009

Kingdom of Northern Italy[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A "Kingdom of Northern Italy" never existed. There was a Kingdom of Sardinia, that in 1861 renamed itself Kingdom of Italy, and never went under the name of Kingdom of Northern Italy. Candalua (talk) 19:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe retarget to Kingdom of Italy (Napoleonic)... The clearest reference to "Kingdom of Northern Italy" that I could find is in this book, which refers to the Napoleonic Kingdom of Italy (in northern Italy) that existed in the early 1800s. Or, delete in order to avoid confusing or misleading readers. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 16:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no sensible target. I don't think a disambiguation page would be helpful either, as there's no state that's actually referred to by this term. Robofish (talk) 00:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Who are you album[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:50, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not useful due to non-standard disambiguation and the fact that the redirect's title is actually longer than target article's title. Who Are You (album) could possibly be a useful redirect, because the parenthetical disambiguator "(album)" is quite common on Wikipedia. (Redirect creator notified using {{RFDNote}}.)BLACK FALCON (TALK) 18:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I went ahead and created the (album) redirect, since you're right, that is a likely search term. EVula // talk // // 19:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Where are we?[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Humorous, but not a useful redirect. No significant page history and 0 views. (Redirect creator notified using {{RFDNote}}.)BLACK FALCON (TALK) 17:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Heh, totally agreed with the nom; got a laugh out of it, but that doesn't mean it should be kept. EVula // talk // // 19:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete But the person who made should get a barnstar of good humor. :D KMFDM FAN (talk!) 21:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not a useful redirect, very few people, if any at all, would likely look that up in search.  Marlith (Talk)  23:40, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, nonsense redirect. Intelligentsium 01:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Slayer's Upcoming 10th Album[edit]

The result of the discussion was DELETE. Fairly uncontroversial deletion. No pertinent history, it was all moved to the new article title. No point keeping as redirect because it is pretty implausible that anyone would type that in. – B.hoteptalk• 18:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed. Album has name. KMFDM FAN (talk!) 16:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Slayer 10th Album[edit]

The result of the discussion was DELETE. Fairly uncontroversial deletion. No pertinent history, it was all moved to the new article title. No point keeping as redirect because it is pretty implausible that anyone would type that in. – B.hoteptalk• 18:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed. Album has Name. KMFDM FAN (talk!) 16:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.