Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 June 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 17, 2009

Chuck Norris Messiah Juice[edit]

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how this relates to anything, especially milk. gordonrox24 (talk) 19:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete—silly. ╟─TreasuryTagconstabulary─╢ 19:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, WP:CSD#R3. Unless the creator can explain this, google searches bring up nothing, nonsense redirect - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, it was a bit silly. See [1]; seeing as the review only came out yesterday. I still think people might search for it, though. Sceptre (talk) 19:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I can see nothing on that except white space at the top and a load of comments underneath. As I said, I did a google search of "Chuck Norris Messiah Juice" (with the quotation marks and without), and couldn't find anything - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nonsense. Moreover, unlikely search term and anyone looking for it will not be looking for milk, but Chuck Norris, which they already have knowledge of. ~ Amory (usertalkcontribs) 19:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as an implausible recent redirect. Tagged as such. decltype (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment-It was mentioned in a video by the Nostalgia Critic when he reviewed Sidekicks. In case you wondered why this redirect existed. KMFDM FAN (talk!) 22:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

What is a legend ?[edit]

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, and the space between "legend" and the question mark makes it fairly unlikely that anybody will be looking for it. GW 12:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not within Wikipedia's scope - this is something for Google to handle. Original was just a good faith creation of a page on Legend. ~ Amory (usertalkcontribs) 19:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—this isn't Wolfram Alpha. ╟─TreasuryTagsheriff─╢ 19:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Incidentally, any search for "What is a [word]?" should bring up the article "[Word]" as the first or second result (I tried it with a number of other articles, such as "duck", "igloo", "banana", and the results were fairly consistent). –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 06:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.