Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 December 18
December 18[edit]
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 18, 2009
User:Pabmeista/Barclaycard[edit]
Pointless cross-namespace redirect left behind by vandalisng socking serial hoaxer: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The One & Only Fools and Horses for more details. pablohablo. 22:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not a plausible search term, no meaningful/useful history. KuyaBriBriTalk 17:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
User:Pabmeista/AntTyler DrWho[edit]
Pointless redirect left behind by vandalsng socking serial hoaxer: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The One & Only Fools and Horses for more details. pablohablo. 22:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not a plausible search term, no meaningful/useful history. KuyaBriBriTalk 17:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan International Airport[edit]
- Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan International Airport → Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport (links to redirect • history • stats)
- Patna Airport(International) → Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport (links to redirect) (stats)
Both erroneously listed at AfD. AfD debate copied here.KuyaBriBriTalk 21:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
For Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan International Airport:
An article for Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport already exists; there is no airport by the name of the article nominated for deletion (it was simply created by a user who has created other variants of the same Jasepl (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- It seems this is a redirect issue. From what to what, I'm not positive. Probably from this to Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport. --Oakshade (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- Its more than that.
- There is already an article called "Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan Airport" - this is valid.
- One user, in an attempt to make the airport looker more important (in his mind anyway) created two additional articles:
- And then filled said pages with either the same exact content as in the valid article, or added random bits of unneeded (or incorrect) information.
- Someone else then removed the content and added a redirect.
- Basically, neither of the new articles should exist, because there's not even a need for a redirect. The airport is not an international one, so the user's adding that word in a new article's title was false.
- Jasepl (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 18:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
For Patna Airport(International):
An article for Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport already exists; there is no airport by the name of the article nominated for deletion (it was simply created by a user who has created other variants of the same) Jasepl (talk) 16:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 18:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport. Salih (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's badly formed under WP:TITLE (specifically, WP:PRECISION) with a missing space and not requiring the parenthetical qualification "International" at all anyway; there's already a redirect at Patna Airport to Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport. Si Trew (talk) 23:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan International Airport. According to the article the airport is considered a "restricted international" airport. As such it is a plausible search term that does no harm. KuyaBriBriTalk 17:15, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Patna Airport(International) due to missing space before parentheses. Patna International airport already exists as a redirect to address my concern expressed above. KuyaBriBriTalk 17:15, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete both - The first appears to be an incorrect and misleading name (and also longer than the actual full name of the airport) due to the inclusion of "Narayan" and the second is an implausible redirect due to the the missing space. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 23:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)