Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 December 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 16, 2009

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Non-admin closure. — The Man in Question (in question) 06:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete consensus in recent AfD for delete not redirect. also very unlikely search term. LibStar (talk) 23:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I can certainly see a situation where someone would come across this name somewhere else and search for it on Wikipedia for more information. faithless (speak) 07:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, searches will end up at the target anyway, and the redirect stops people from writing an article about the person. Can't see any advantages of deletion. — Kusma talk 09:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep definitely a target by cut and paste. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirects which point to list entries are quite standard per WP:REDIRECT#Sub-topics and small topics in broader contexts. The supposition that no-one will search for this seems quite erroneous. If you look at the stats from the past such as September, you will see that the name gets lots of hits and has a remarkably high rank. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Faithless. — The Man in Question (in question) 00:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - this seems exactly something that might be searched for. Pseudomonas(talk) 18:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Tony "Mommy" Eggmonterorer[edit]

The result of the discussion was retarget Tony "Mommy" Eggmonteror to Lemony Snicket: The Unauthorized Autobiography#Hidden anagrams and delete Tony "Mommy" Eggmonterorer (misspelling). –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 22:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in target article. Only three and twelve pageviews in November, respectively. Anyone searching Google for information on this topic will not find it on Wikipedia. — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 19:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of these has some history, but what about retargetting to either Animals in A Series of Unfortunate Events#Mamba du Mal or Lemony Snicket: The Unauthorized Autobiography#Hidden Anagrams? Personally I prefer the latter since it is currently more useful, but I'm not sure that information is going to last. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If the autobiography ever becomes a Good Article or better, it will undoubtedly lose the "Hidden Anagrams" section in the process, as you've suggested. Honestly, it seems so trivial. I understand the worries about page history, but still…especially the first (Tony "Mommy" Eggmonterorer), which is not notable, not mentioned in the target article, and not spelled correctly at all. Some editors have frowned on my use of analogies before, but still, it's like creating a Billy Ray Cryrus[1] redirect to List of 30 Rock characters or something. It just makes you say, "What?" — The Man in Question (in question) 20:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 22:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'either retarget, or add the character to the target article Upgrade rather than downgrade. There should be a link for every named character in a more than ordinarily notable fiction to the fiction, or to some subpage of it. DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to what? — The Man in Question (in question) 06:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nominator. "Tony 'Mommy' Eggmonteror" is not a character in the series. It is an anagram of the name of the author of a fictional book appearing in a supplementary book to the series. Articles should ideally contain third-party published sources. There are no such sources that mention "Tony 'Mommy' Eggmonteror", and never are there likely to be any. "Tony 'Mommy' Eggmonterorer" is a misspelling of this unnotable aspect of the series. — The Man in Question (in question) 07:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

TSOTL[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 22:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Initials for a target of inerest to a limited subculture. May cause confusion with other subjects that happen to share the same or similar initials. No indication that any existing subject is referred to by these initials enough to justify creation of a disambiguation page. --Allen3 talk 21:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Alexander Margaritiis[edit]

The result of the discussion was Keep. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Typo. Cybervoron (talk) 08:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, typos are one of the reasons for having redirects. It seems plausible enough. --Taelus (talk) 11:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as above. LibStar (talk) 02:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_16&oldid=1138576548"