Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 December 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 13, 2009

Sky of chaos[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 01:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is from total speculation. quick Google brings up nothing. The first post was from a forum speculation, and the title is probably incorrect as it is. The view stats are close to nothing; most of them this month are from User:Brambleclawx and me. Please delete, as it really doesn't help. Airplaneman talk 01:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as indicated above. Page probably created from speculation of a 5th series (there is no evidence, and no 5th series has been announced), or it is the name of a Fanfiction. Brambleclawx (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Warrior kittys[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 01:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect not relevant, as hardly anyone looking to learn about the Warrior cats would search "Warrior kittys". Page view stats. Two of the hits were from User:Brambleclawx and me looking at page. Airplaneman talk 23:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as indicated above. Note that I actually viewed the page multiple times. The diction of the title is not particularly good, and "kittys" is a misspelling of "kitties". Not many people would actually search this term. Brambleclawx (talk) 23:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:SNAFU[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 01:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. 1: SNAFU has nothing to do with an ampersand, and 2: The Wikipedia namespace usually should not redirect to the main namespace. Samwb123T-C-@ 18:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as weird Josh Parris 02:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I can't really work out what on earth that redirect is doing there... Very odd. --Taelus (talk) 08:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; makes no sense. 188.221.240.150 (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: very strange... no obvious relationship.Brambleclawx (talk) 04:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as either a subtle (too subtle, in my opinion) criticism of Wikipedia or just very odd... –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 07:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Perhaps it was created because encodings beginning with & (such as &nbsр;) would present a snafu in the mainspace if not handled properly? Pshh, who knows. — The Man in Question (in question) 23:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Парадокс близанаца[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unfortunately merging to the Serbian Wikipedia is beyond the remit of en.wiki administrators. Ruslik_Zero 20:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted. Anon started Serbian article on the twin paradox. Gets the occasional hit, so I wouldn't mind, but it might draw search engine hits away from the Serbian Wikipedia's entry. Paradoctor (talk) 02:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Transwiki and histmerge to the Serbian article, to preseve GFDL history of the Serbian article. 76.66.192.35 (talk) 06:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to the serbian wikipedia. --MisterWiki talk contribs 14:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Association Contre le Harcèlement Professionnel[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 01:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects from name of an very obscure organization to article about an obscure Spanish physicist where it is only mentioned in one sentence. There is no indication of notability of this organization so those redirects are unlikely to be useful. Also, in the English Wikipedia, no one will be searching for the Spanish title. 93.136.141.144 (talk) 12:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per above. --MisterWiki talk contribs 14:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redirecting this (obscure) organisation to an individual is not appropriate; if a reader wants information on the organisation the target is not going to enlighten them. There's a non-trivial amount of traffic to the first option, so if it becomes a redlink there's a chance that an article may be born. Josh Parris 01:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_13&oldid=1138576534"