Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 1

April 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 1, 2009

The result of the discussion was delete all of the below A1 redirects.--Aervanath (talk) 07:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A1+ → A1[edit]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. Although there are A1 TV stations listed, this Armenian one isn't there, so this should just be a redlink. JaGa^talk 20:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1978a → A1[edit]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. It refers to a comet with no article, so it should just be a redlink. JaGa^talk 19:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. Tavix (talk) 23:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A1Plus Filmproduktion → A1[edit]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. There are film companies in the disambig, but none of them bear this specific name. JaGa^talk 19:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not mentioned on the disambiguation page, highly unlikely search term. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 19:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DJ A-1 → A1[edit]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A1 (rap) → A1[edit]

Refers to A-1 (rapper), a non-notable rap artist. JaGa^talk 19:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A-1 (rapper) → List of northern California rappers[edit]

Non-notable rap artist. JaGa^talk 19:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not even mentioned on the target page, non notable. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 19:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A1. → A1[edit]

Another unlikely A1 redirect. JaGa^talk 18:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Highly unlikely search term. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 19:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A-1 (artist) → A1[edit]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 18:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unlikely search term, not listed on the disambiguation page. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 19:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

System32 → Architecture of Windows NT[edit]

The result of the discussion was keep--Aervanath (talk) 06:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting this will make Wikipedia go faster. MuZemike being orange^{Or is Orangemike being MuZe?} 01:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what you said made no sense to me. Care to rephrase? (If a joke can't be parsed, it's a lousy joke) 76.66.193.69 (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the joke is that deleting Windows NT makes everything go faster. But, still, it's not called System32. So delete. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note – it was actually supposed to be an April Fools prank (i.e. tricking someone into crashing Windows by deleting the System32 folder because "someone told them it would make Windows go faster"), but I can let the discussion go on if a need for deletion is actually legit. MuZemike 21:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, Windows (though not only NT...) does have a System32 folder, so it is a likely search term. Also looks like it was an April Fools joke (I'm no fan of those but I admit this one made me smile) - Nabla (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.