Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 30
November 30[edit]
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 30, 2008
Bood values → Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Blood values[edit]
The result of the debate was Retarget to Reference ranges for blood tests. Lenticel (talk) 05:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Highly unlikely CNR to a project page. MBisanz talk 09:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- It was just a stupid spelling error, remaining after a compensating article move. Jolly well delete it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Still, though, it sounds kind of funny. Yet, I don't think that reason is good enough to keep it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Retarget to Reference ranges for blood tests, which is where Blood values points and where the image referenced is used. --UsaSatsui (talk) 13:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Retarget as per UsaSatsui. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Retarget as UsaSatsui said. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Retarget per above. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - "Bood" is not a plausible misspelling of "blood". Otto4711 (talk) 23:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia status → Wikipedia:Editor activity indicator[edit]
The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Improper CNR to a wiki-process, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 09:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Wikipedia Cookbook → Wikipedia:Cookbook[edit]
The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Improper CNR to a defunct project, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 09:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Soft Redirect to Wikimedia Cookbook. It seems pretty obvious that someone searching for this term is looking for that target. --UsaSatsui (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, XNR. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Stubify if notable. A soft redirect makes sense but is a self-reference, not intended for mainspace. --Thinboy00 @106, i.e. 01:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
BIDRAFT1 → Wikipedia:BITERM guideline proposal draft 1 (sandbox working version)[edit]
The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Improper CNR to a project draft, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 09:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK - it only a redirect page. I'll comment there. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- If this use of redirect is against policy, what do you suggest? I'll do what is suggested. The WP:BITASK taskforce itself is important, and is only on hold pending discussion at WP:IDTF. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well the redirect WP:BIDRAFT1 would probably be the best redirect, since it puts the page in the Projectspace so readers would not see it on a search for articles. MBisanz talk 20:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- I see what you mean now. I'll get on it tomorrow. Sometimes people are funny when you use "WP:" - so sometimes I've kept away from it. With the search box in mind though, using WP makes a lot more sense - this page is for wikipedians, not the encyclopedia readers. --Matt Lewis (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- OK - I've created WP:BIDRAFT1 and WP:BIDRAFT2, and have sorted the 'What links here' pages that link to them. You can delete BIDRAFT1 and BIDRAFT2. --Matt Lewis (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- I see what you mean now. I'll get on it tomorrow. Sometimes people are funny when you use "WP:" - so sometimes I've kept away from it. With the search box in mind though, using WP makes a lot more sense - this page is for wikipedians, not the encyclopedia readers. --Matt Lewis (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well the redirect WP:BIDRAFT1 would probably be the best redirect, since it puts the page in the Projectspace so readers would not see it on a search for articles. MBisanz talk 20:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Zelda 14 → The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass[edit]
The result of the debate was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Unscented (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
There is no fourteeth Zelda game; most of the the numbered redirects to Zelda games went to the wrong pages, and when I fixed them, this one was left over. Unscented (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.