Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 April 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 21[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 21, 2008

Phil TrubeyFascism[edit]

The result of the debate was already speedy deleted by User:Toddst1 [1]. Gavia immer (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently malicious redirect of businessman to ideology Skomorokh 23:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

IESVS NAZARENVS REX IVDAEORVMJesus[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to INRI. Redirects exist to direct people to where content is located. The full term is used at INRI and this is a reasonable search term. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely search term [the full Latin name for Jesus]. No links, bot created redirs. RichardΩ612 19:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Yer mamChav[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted by User:Hiberniantears per CSD G3 [Vandalism]. Non-admin closure. ><RichardΩ612 21:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I previously tagged this for SD per R3, but it was declined by User:J Milburn on the grounds that it could be a potential search term. Without wanting to seem militant, I really do not see the connection between 'Yer mam' and chavs, so I thought I'd list it here to see what others thought. RichardΩ612 16:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to mother insult — a more realistic target page. EJF (talk) 18:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I could see "your mom" redirect, but such a spelling doesn't seem like a likely search term. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to mother insult as a plausible search term. Some people type 'your' that way and some people type 'mom'/'mum' that way.–Pomte 02:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

BambisMother[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy deletion per R3. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Bambi's Mother'... very cute but pointless. Nonsense redirect. RichardΩ612 16:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Nobody is going to search for "Bambis" when they're looking for "Mother".
  • Speedy delete R3 - not only an unlikely search item, it borders on nonsense. One can argue that this redirect is vandalism.B.Wind (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Self-pwnSuicide[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. mattbr 12:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search terms, no links in articles. Seem to have been created for/based on a reply on the creator's talk page. RichardΩ612 16:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikiproject physicsWikipedia:WikiProject Physics[edit]

The result of the debate was Delete per CSD R2 by User:Edokter. Non-admin closure. ><RichardΩ612 16:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary XNR. 68.248.228.138 (talk) 08:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Confusing redirect from mainspace to elsewhere. WikiProject Physics is not a notable phenomenon :D. Also redundant to redirects like WP:PHYSICS, WP:PHYS, etc. Happymelon 10:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mary OrrAll About Eve[edit]

The result of the debate was nomination closed as the page is now an article. mattbr 12:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked on the link to Mary Orr to find more about her after seeing the mention in the All About Eve article; needless to say, I was less than enlightened. --Tothebarricades (talk) 03:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.