Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 April 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 19[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 19, 2008

Redirects from specific dates[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following redirects are from specific historical dates to more general articles on individual dates. All of them have been orphaned and none have any useful page history.

While some redirects from specific dates are quite useful (e.g. January 19, 2038Year 2038 problem), redirects from every random date are not needed. First, they are individually extremely unlikely search terms, and their retention sets a precedent for creating ca. 1,5 million redirects for the past 2000 years (750 thousand in "Month Day, Year" format and an equal number in "Day Month Year" form).

Second, their existence encourages violation of WP:MOSDATE, which specifies that the Month-Day and Year should be linked separately so that full dates are displayed according to user preferences. Typing [[January 14, 2007]] essentially overrides user preferences. Deleting these redirects would mean that anyone who types this type of combination would encounter a redlink and be prompted to fix the link; keeping the redirects would mean that anyone who types this type of combination would encounter a bluelink and would mistakenly think that there is no problem.

There are approximately 125 other redirects of this type. If there is consensus for their deletion, I intend to fix any links to them (per WP:MOSDATE) and subsequently nominate them at RFD. Black Falcon (Talk) 20:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unlikely search terms for the target articles. It seems that, aside from this deletion discussion, the only page that links to these redirects is User:SQL/Months. Should these be deleted, SQL should be notified of the decision. B.Wind (talk) 03:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have actually been working based on SQL's list of articles, which he generated based on this bot request. Black Falcon (Talk) 03:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as low utility redirects and unlikely search terms. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 04:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unlikely redirect.--Lenticel (talk) 08:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unnesecary, and if we did this for every date, there would be a hundred thousand redirects.
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

RS TipsRuneScape[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following:

All seem very unlikely search terms. ><RichardΩ612 11:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems an extremely unlikely redirect. It is very unlikely that someone would search for 'RS Tips' looking for 'Runescape'. RichardΩ612 11:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete RS Tips as ambiguous ("RS" could refer to so many other things besides RuneScape) and per WP:NOT#GUIDE. No comment on the others since I don't really know much about RuneScape. Black Falcon (Talk) 21:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. None of these terms appear in the target article. B.Wind (talk) 03:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - not useful as redirects. Terraxos (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Lenalee LeeLenalee Lee (D.Gray Man)[edit]

The result of the debate was Move performed as this seems uncontroversial. Next time please use WP:RM as intended, however. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I changed the redirect to redirect to the new page, I realize that it has become useless because of that page. A search tells me that there are no other characters/people by this name. The only unrelated page is the surname Li. There are no linked pages to the redirect. itzjustdrama still new to this (talk) 06:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly what I was asking for. But that is a better idea. Hope I'm doing this right. I withdraw my nomination and I wish for the pages to be merged or the latter moved. I'll look into that. itzjustdrama still new to this (talk) 19:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to move it to Lenalee Lee but could not. This will require admin intervention to do this. Admin, move target article to Lenalee Lee and close this discussion. B.Wind (talk) 03:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.