Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 April 14
April 14[edit]
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 14, 2008
template:Chinese Emperor 6 → template:Qing namebox[edit]
no longer used, related Chinese Emperor 0 to 7 have been deleted, leaving only {{Chinese Emperor}} and {{Qing namebox}} 70.55.85.225 (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed with nomination. John Smith's (talk) 06:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination --Liempt (talk) 02:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Lenticel (talk) 08:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Relevant discussion at the RfD for 1-5 and 7 here: Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 28#Chinese Emperor templates. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 14:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Intec Systems → Symantec[edit]
Symantec has acquired Intec Systems, but it may have had a history prior to that. The Symantec article doesn't mention Intec with a single word so anyone trying to find something about Intec won't find it. This has been done probably to remove red links from the List of Symantec acquisitions. This is, imo, not a good reason for a lousy redirect. RfD should apply to other company names mentioned in the List of Symantec acquisitions without their own article at least if they're not even mentioned in the Symantec page. --Sigmundur (talk) 10:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Retarget to List of Symantec acquisitions until we could craft an article about it or mention it in greater detail in a better article.--Lenticel (talk) 08:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Close discussion as Intec Systems is not a redirect article as of April 15, but a very short (two sentence) "stub article". Its desirability is open to debate, but this is not the proper forum for such a discussion (AfD is). B.Wind (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy close per B.Wind; nom is probably right about the article, but no need to delete, be bold. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)