Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 March 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 18[edit]

WP:UNSIGNED → Template:Unsigned[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Wikipedia:Signatures#Dealing with unsigned comments. -- JLaTondre 01:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cross namespace redirect; it doesn't save anyone any typing; it was created by someone who couldn't remember where the original template is ({{Unsigned}}); it's not used. -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 09:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Sexual repression → Religion and sexuality[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears not to have had any original content but to consist solely of redirects, which were disputed. Several redirects were attempted over its history, e.g. to Sex, Sexual intercourse, Sexuality and morality, then Religion and sexuality, but each was regarded as reflecting a POV view of the target topic and not effectively covering the topic of sexual repression as a subject within psychology. Accordingly, given that the topic itself is notable but it is better to say nothing than to say something incorrect about it, it is proposed to delete the article, without prejudice, until such time as someone can develop appropriate content on this psychology/psychoanalytic theory topic. --Shirahadasha 08:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I wondered about retargetting it to Sexual abstinence, which is better than the previous targets. But abstinence is not necessarily an act of repression, nor does it necessarily result from it. Unless someone else comes up with a NPOV target, I agree with the nom. WjBscribe 13:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A rather clear violation of WP:NPOV. JuJube 00:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agreed, violates NPOV. Alex43223 T | C | E 03:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, not sure if this would be NPOV enough, but what about a redirect to Reparative therapy? ^demon[omg plz] 01:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not happy with that one given that it only pertains to repressing same-sex sexual desires, which is not necessarily what the user searching for this term is looking for. Also, it seems to make a negative comment about reparative therapy, which Wikipedia shouldn't be making- however distasteful one might find the concept... sigh. WjBscribe 02:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Didn't think so. I knew it wasn't perfect, but I thought I'd just suggest it. ^demon[omg plz] 02:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

VFU → Wikipedia:Deletion review[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

XNR dating from when Deletion Review was called Votes for Undeletion. Given the change in title this redirect now serves little purpose (WP:VFU exists as a redirect to the same page) and should be deleted. There do not appear to be any encyclopedic topics using this abbreviation. WjBscribe 01:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused crossnamespace redirect. --Sigma 7 13:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_18&oldid=1079093036"