Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 March 11

March 11[edit]

Requested bots → Wikipedia:Bot requests[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. —freak(talk) 07:52, Mar. 16, 2007 (UTC)

Cross-namespace redirect. Doesn't seem to serve any useful purpose as anyone requesting a Bot (or wishing to comment on requests) would know to look in the Wikipedia namespace. WjBscribe 02:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No incoming, cnr, not really useful. --- RockMFR 04:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, undesirable cross-namespace redirect – Qxz 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the cross-namespace redirect. No need. Alex43223^{T | C | E} 23:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since unlikely-to-be-used, cross namespace redirect. -- Jreferee 15:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Disambig repair → Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. —freak(talk) 07:52, Mar. 16, 2007 (UTC)

Another cross-namespace redirect with no relevance to encyclopedia users. WjBscribe 02:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just one incoming link, cnr, not useful. --- RockMFR 04:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, undesirable cross-namespace redirect – Qxz 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I stated, cross namespace redirect. Alex43223^{T | C | E} 23:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since unlikely-to-be-used cross namespace redirect. -- Jreferee 15:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

AAAAAAAAA! → Uncyclopedia (2nd Nomination)[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by NawlinWiki as a nonsense redirect. WjBscribe 23:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and a bunch of others with similar names. I don't know if there is any real reason these redirects exist. Was someone just being annoying? Stevage 13:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First nomination

Comment - see http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/AAAAAAAAA! --- RockMFR 17:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is actually an inside joke in Uncyclopedia. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - erm, shouldn't inside jokes be kept, well, "inside"? Why do we want to honour their inside joke here? Stevage 03:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One of these was just deleted. [1] Wouldn't these fall under WP:CSD#R3? — MichaelLinnear 03:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In addition, Kitten huffing is another redirect to Uncyclopedia. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because they serve to help discourage the recreation of popular Uncyclopedia pages here. (If you're an admin, see the deleted history of Kitten huffing.) --ais523 10:16, 12 March 2007 (U T C)

We should not let vandals control what is done here. — MichaelLinnear 23:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 August 8. Uncle G 21:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, retargetting would be a much better solution, as there is no mention of AAAAAAAAAA! in the current article. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to what? — MichaelLinnear 05:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and protect per Ais523 – Qxz 19:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Come on, this is getting silly. Keep and add a brief reference to AAAAA to the article. >Radiant< 10:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Retarget results of the first the first RfD now leads to a deleted article. You also might want to check out User:Gspbeetle, Jonathan_Huang, Chronarion, Kitten_huffing, and Psyklopedin. -- Jreferee 14:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pavel Vozenilek 01:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

CamGirl → Cam whore[edit]

The result of the debate was delete John Reaves (talk) 09:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Left over from a useless page move from a while ago that I reverted without controversy. — flamingspinach | (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After doing a search, the only things I seem to find are users profiles on various sites. No need to keep. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 22:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Useless redirect term. --- RockMFR 23:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I expanded the cam whore article and did not find sources associating the term "cam girl" with the term "cam whore". In addition, the redirect wrongly implies that all girls who show themselves on the internet via a camera are whores. Camkid should also be delted under similar reasoning.-- Jreferee 15:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.