Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 June 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 26[edit]

Third opinionWikipedia:Third opinion[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. Closing a tad early; consensus is unlikely to change. Sr13 20:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cross namespace redirect. --Hetar 00:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete "third opinion" is a general concept, and we might well want to have a general article there.DGG 02:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per DGG. Shalom Hello 16:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per DGG. --- RockMFR 17:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete - Per DGG. I'll put it up for speedy right now. Cool Bluetalk to me 22:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Plus, it's actually easier to type "WP:30" than "Third opinion".  hmwith  talk 22:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per DGG. Tiggerjay 00:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Cheeseburger Eating Surrender MonkeyRepublican Party (United States)[edit]

The result of the debate was speedied. After Midnight 0001 23:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I've done something wrong in this listing, it's the first time I've found a redirect page that's vandalism (qualifies as an attack page, I believe). The user has this as his/her only edit. Accounting4Taste 20:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Logan's Run (2007 film)Logan's Run (2010 film)[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. -- John Reaves (talk) 02:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The remake of this film will not be released in 2007, as there is no actual production of the project yet. Page history has been moved to Logan's Run (2010 film) per IMDb's estimated release year (which it estimated was 2007 before) for the sake of preservation, but the 2010 article will redirect to the source article until production begins. Erik (talkcontrib) - 15:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for now. Someone might have heard that it will be released in 2007 a few years back, and is searching for it now, as it's this year, looking for more information. No harm in keeping it.  hmwith  talk 22:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to discourage WP:CRYSTAL activity. --Aarktica 14:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Talk:FactotumTalk:Factotum (novel)[edit]

The result of the debate was Blanked. No need for actual deletion. -- JLaTondre 00:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Factotum article talk page redirects to talk page of Factotum (novel), hindering discussion of the Factotum article. History contains only a move and a robot double redirect fix. The Storm Surfer 01:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blank the page That's what I'm about to do. It's pretty much a no-brainer. If anyone wants to actually delete the page, go ahead. Shalom Hello 05:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Red-AlLithium aluminium hydride[edit]

The result of the debate was No longer a redirect. -- JLaTondre 11:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Red-Al" is a synonym for sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminumhydride, not lithium aluminum hydride. The redirect should be deleted to avoid confusion between these two distinctly different (although related, hence increased cause for confusion) chemical entities. 68.43.182.159 14:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.