Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 December 16

December 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on December 16, 2007

Black Death woman → Black Death[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete - redirects that result from page move vandalism can be speedy deleted under CSD G3. WjBscribe 00:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect the result of a "vandalistic move," according to page history. No pages link to it. — AnnaKucsma Speak! 19:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A.b.s → Susan B. Anthony[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete - redirects that result from page move vandalism can be speedy deleted under CSD G3 SkierRMH (talk) 06:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"A.b.s" is a highly unlikely redirect. No pages link to it. — AnnaKucsma Speak! 19:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC) (Fixed link piping, 00:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)~)[reply]

Speedy-delete. This is either a leftover from pagemove vandalism or a leftover from a very confused series of pagemoves which ended with the original article right back where it started. Rossami (talk) 05:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

''Kaiserlich_und_königlich'' → Kaiserlich und königlich[edit]

The result of the debate was Delete. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An unlikely title for the target - note that those are paired single quotes around the title, not double quotes. Nobody is likely to use this. — Gavia immer (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say that I don't think it impossible that someone might search for the term with quotes, and thus keep, but since it's paired single quotes then I agree with delete. -- Arwel (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even proper double quotes should be deleted, the term was used w/o them. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 12:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This doesn't satisfy any of the reasons for deletion. It's harmless. If somebody thought of it once, somebody else may think of it again. —Toby Bartels (talk) 22:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

"Josephites" → Josephites[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted by Anthony.bradbury as db-redirtypo. -- JLaTondre 14:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

|I don't think having a redirect with quotes from both sides is a good idea. it's confusing and useless. Besides, this link is orphan -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Comment Quotes are not considered as a "misspelling". Case closed with a speedy deletion-- Magioladitis (talk) 12:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.