Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 April 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 19[edit]

WikiNameCamelCase[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 20:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this redirect should be deleted. A WikiName is not purely an example of CamelCase, and neither does it warrant its own article. --84.68.126.146 19:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: avoid self reference. Besides, who types "WikiName" into the search box??? YechielMan 06:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a self reference. --84.68.126.146 00:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Homepage (television)Main Page[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 17:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was an article about a TV show located at HomePage, but it was deleted as non-notable, and the page redirected to Main Page instead. This redirect pointed there and now points to Main Page following a double-redirect fix by a bot. However, since we have no article about the TV show, and Main Page itself has nothing to do with the TV show or television in general, it's useless – Gurch 13:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is NOT a television show. TheBlazikenMaster 14:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
also delete but that would be the best TV show ever: Wikipedia, the series. Or even better: Wikipedia: the motion picture! Wintermut3 18:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Various redirects to special pages[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 20:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useless borked cross-namespace redirects to special pages. MER-C 07:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're not actually useless, it just requires an extra click on the redirect link to get to the desired page, as with double redirects. They are, however, unnecessary – Gurch 11:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Agree that these are unnecessary- mistyping special pagenames gives a link to a list of all special pages anyway (try special:kangaroo for example). We don't need these XNRs. WjBscribe 20:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete cnr JuJube 21:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

These Foolish Things (Remind Me Of You)These Foolish Things[edit]

The result of the debate was Move request and belongs at WP:RM and not here. The nomination has the redirect and target reversed. -- JLaTondre 16:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for a disambiguation link. There is only one song with the title "These Foolish Things". Also, this article was created only a few months ago. There is still very little detailed information here, so it isn't much more than a stub. This article should first be moved to "These Foolish Things", then "These Foolish Things (Remind Me Of You)" should be deleted. Preserving the original redirect should be unnecessary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Winstonho0805 (talkcontribs).

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Hey blinkin'Abraham Lincoln[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. Probably meant to be a joke sounding like "Abe Lincoln". -- JLaTondre 16:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no fuckin' sense. I can't see how "Hey blinkin'" has anything to do with Abraham. What does that have anything to do with Abe? TheBlazikenMaster 14:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

===Professional Information Security Association===Professional Information Security Association[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete (CSD R3). WjBscribe 20:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad name, obviously a mistake by the creator — Jack · talk · 15:57, Thursday, 19 April 2007

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Der Schuhmacher und die HeinzelmännchenDie Wichtelmänner[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 17:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the original german title, but a wrong retranslation. See Talk:The Elves and the Shoemaker. I've corrected all incoming links and moved it to the correct title already. Heizer 16:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't know what the hell it is, but you're damn right. Re-translations don't make sense. Plus it's a double redirect. TheBlazikenMaster 11:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.