Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 9[edit]

Save The Last Dance for Me (2004) → Save the Last Dance for Me (TV series)[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 13:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I recently moved the article as per naming conventions for television series, this is now a non-descriptive redirect. PC78 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete no pages link to it and it is an unlikely search term. Koweja 00:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Save The Last Dance For Me (2004) → Save The Last Dance for Me (2004)[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 13:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This now redirects to a redirect. PC78 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete no pages link to it and it is an unlikely search term. Koweja 00:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Instruction creep → Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep[edit]

The result of the debate was no longer a redirect. — CharlotteWebb 23:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross namespace redirect. — Seadog 19:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is that really a problem? If someone wants to know what instruction creep means, either we should redirect to some page that explains it (even a WP page), or we should create an article for it, and provide a disambig link to the page. The answer is not to delete it. Fresheneesz 22:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep seems to be a sensible re-direct. Catchpole 15:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment I agree with Fresheneesz; I have taken the liberty of starting an article on this with text taken from the associated Wikipedia page. Let me know what you think. Dar-Ape 21:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep since it now an actual article. Actually, since it's no longer a redirect, isn't this discussion basically over? Koweja 00:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Close no longer a redirect. Eluchil404 22:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WP:RPPres and WP:PhilPres→ Portal:Presidency of the Philippines[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted & created P: versions where they should be. -- JLaTondre 13:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong crosspace redirect. --Howard the Duck 13:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

George Stoney (professor of communications) → George C. Stoney[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted (db-author). -- JLaTondre 14:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I created this page today in error, not having found George C. Stoney. Please delete w/my apologies Bill Huston (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

ThrottleMetal → Throttle (band)[edit]

The result of the debate was speedily deleted by Quarl. --Gh87 06:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article was prod-deleted on 30 November, per [1]; redirect is simply another name for this non-notable band John Broughton | Talk 02:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Double Dragon V: The Shadow Falls → Double Dragon[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 13:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While "Double Dragon" is a series of computer games, "Double Dragon V" is a specific computer game, whose article should be seperate. Furthur more, the "Double Dragon" article does not give information about "Double Dragon V", instead, it simply links to the "Double Dragon V" article, and by such is forming a loop. Gelbard 07:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless it becomes its own article. Dar-Ape 21:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Flintsone Creek → Flintsone, Maryland[edit]

The result of the debate was Fixed. If someone disagrees with the target they can re-nominate, but the original problem has been resolved. -- JLaTondre 16:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to nonexistant article. Natl1 15:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The redirect has now been retargeted to Flintstone, Maryland (note spelling). It appears that User:Dhaluza is just having trouble with getting the target right. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 15:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2006_December_9&oldid=1062548640"