Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 29[edit]

Wierd Al Yonkivich"Weird Al" Yankovic[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an odd spelling I've never seen, there are no links to it except for someone's user page (a list of their watched items, which "Weird Al" Yankovic is already on). Only four google hits total[1]. I think it is unneeded. WillMak050389 04:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I could see some of the spelling mistakes in the redirect being made individually but I doubt that anyone would make all of them at once when tyring to type his name. --70.48.109.189 04:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unneeded. Jwolfe 11:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete House of Scandal 23:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per 70.48... Koweja 14:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Two odd misspellings like that means someone needs to type better, not be redirected. --Wizardman 04:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per 70.48.109.189. Iced Kola 01:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. What's the harm? Philwelch 00:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mr. Mickey Mouse is also knownMickey Mouse[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete. Renesis (talk) 02:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect doesn't make any sense at all. Created by a user who was involved in the creation of some of the other nonsense redirects listed below. --- RockMFR 17:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G1 (patent nonsense) along with the redirects below. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 14:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete along with those listed below as per the two above comments. HouseOfScandal 00:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • speedy delete per above. —dima/s-ko/ 01:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mickey NiemotkaCorey Jaggi[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the first of a—wait for it—decuple redirect, none of the parts of which appears to serve any encyclopedic purpose. A Googling of any single pair reveals no connection betwixt its components, no single one of which appears to be apropos of an individual about whom a valid article could be written (such that every involved page is one to which a redirect ought never to point), and it appears eminently likely that these are nonsense redirects to essentially non-existent pages (although I don't imagine that G1, G3, or R1 should technically apply). Joe 06:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete all. In my opinion G1 and G3 do apply since the pages are non functional nonsense. Eluchil404 14:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete as G1 (patent nonsense) or G3 (vandalism). No encyclopedic purpose (and note that these were created by User:Kyle Mercadante, with the same name as one of the redirects). Gavia immer (u|t|c) 15:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete all. Also recommend blocking user who created them. --- RockMFR 17:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Isaac PinkusCorey Jaggi[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Corey JaggiMr. Langew[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mr. LangewMiget Marshall-Sealy[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Miget Marshall-SealyScott Nalls[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Scott NallsScott Ehlen[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Scott EhlenAttucks[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

AttucksMr. Langevin[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mr. LangevinKyle Mercadante[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Kyle MercadanteMr. Mickey[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mr. MickeyMickey Mouse[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (vandalism/nonsense). Renesis (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above and inasmuch as, whilst Mr. Mickey might be a valid search for Mickey Mouse, such formulation does not appear common (none of the first 100 Ghits for Mr. Mickey references Mickey Mouse). Then again, I don't know that our keeping this one would be particularly harmful; after all, redirects are cheap. Joe 06:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Lost of forests in FranceList of forests in France[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. While it might be an easy typo, I have to agree with Eluchil404. -- JLaTondre 00:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo Kmorozov 07:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete while redirects from typos are often appropriate, I think that this one is too confusing to be useful. Eluchil404 14:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely typo. --- RockMFR 17:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per Eluchil404. —dima/s-ko/ 01:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Wizardman 04:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I think redirects from common misspellings are useful, but I doubt this one would be. If someone typed this in, they'd realize their mistake quickly. No way could we have a "lost of" redirect for every "list of" article, why should this one be special? delldot | talk 03:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Harmless, and the I and O keys are right next to each other. Philwelch 00:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Signal LightsAmtsakhara[edit]

The result of the debate was converted to disambig and moved to lower case. -- JLaTondre 23:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No apparent link between the two articles (and the redirect's name is nowhere in the target's text) Schutz 16:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.