Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 19
| < January 18 | January 20 > |
|---|
January 19[edit]
File:Mountains and Clouds sculpture by Alexander Calder.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I hate to bring such a beautiful image here; however, the image is of an artist's sculpture housed within the United States Circa 1986 and therefor public domain can not be assertain as the United states does not have a freedom of panorama clause on artwork; even on U.S. Government property. See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. This would also pertain to all images of this sculpture on the article Mountains and Clouds Calmer Waters 06:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Retag + FUR It is copyrightable and needs to be labeled as such. Add a fair use rationale for the article. — BQZip01 — talk 21:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Joel and Victoria Osteen.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pixelation and perspective shape distortion indicate this is not a normal photograph, but a photograph from a large video screen or something similar. In that case, it would likely be non-free. Fut.Perf. ☼ 00:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- reason Mcelite (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I took that picture myself and it wasn't a great shot but it was ok. Then another editor retouched it like a year or two ago.Mcelite (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:HotInHollywood.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HotInHollywood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted (if not, then no need for user created art). No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Rally Bulgaria 2009 - New Roads.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This user has numerous other copyright issues. Other uploads "using Rally Bulgaria 2009's official documents" have been clear copyvios; this one doesn't have the watermark but is almost certainly also a copyright violation. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Advanced Tech Command Deck - 1st Edition.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; OTRS permission received. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No evidence that uploader is really copyright holder. Very similar images are at [1] and [2]. Contains copyright tag. Svick (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How might I go about proving I am the copyright holder? --Meeslow (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- By sending an e-mail from e-mail address associated with the website insurgencygaming.co.uk to [email protected] stating that you own the copyright of that image and that you release it under the license you chose (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike). See also WP:IOWN. Svick (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The email has now been sent, please confirm receipt and that the image will not be removed. Thanks. --Meeslow (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added a template to the image page saying that the e-mail was sent. Now we have to wait until someone with an access to emails sent to Wikipedia confirms it. Svick (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How long is this process likely to take? I see that the image still has the warning label. --Meeslow (talk) 23:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- About two weeks. And as it so happens, the two weeks just ended and the permission has been accepted. Stifle (talk) 11:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.