Wikipedia:Peer review/Maughan Library/archive1

Maughan Library[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am looking to improve the article to GA. I'm relatively inexperienced so any general and stylistic comment are much appreciated. One specific question is whether it would be best to merge Domus Conversorum?

Many thanks, Trillig (talk) 02:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Nikkimaria

My vote would be no to the merge
A general copy-edit would be helpful in improving this article's quality - I'm seeing a few grammatical errors
Does the library have any electronic holdings of note?
Suggest including a sentence for each of the special collections outlining what it holds
Suggest including further information on services
Suggest including usage statistics, if known - number of patrons, number of items borrowed per year, etc
Generally don't link things in See also already linked in the article
Check consistency between shortened citations and full bibliographic record - for example FN13 says Dewe was published in 2009, while the bibliographic entry says 2008. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]