Wikipedia:Peer review/Gilbert Perreault/archive1

Gilbert Perreault

I've listed this article for peer review because a debate has been going on at User_talk:RGTraynor#Gilbert_Perreault regarding

RGTraynor edits,

TonyTheTiger partial revert,

RGTraynor revert,

TonyTheTiger line by line item by item revert (see edit summaries).

We have taken the article to the talk page of both WP:HOCKEY and WP:WPBIO with no response. We need some opinions on the level of referencing.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Automated review

• Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 00:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Yannismarou

• A picture of him would be helpful, but I do not know if it is easy to find one.
• "Blessed with an uncanny ability to stickhandle in close quarters, he was regarded as one of the most gifted and skillful playmaking centers ever to play the game." Hmmm ... "Blessed with" etc. tend to be a bit POV IMO. Done--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Anything about his personal life?
• Per WP:MOS, do not wikilink single years ("In 1969 and 1970"), only full dates. Done--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Try not to have uncited paragraphs like the second in "Professional career".
• The two templates you have after Statistics go at the end of the article. Done--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Trim as much as you can the "See also" section, incorporating links in the main text.
• I did not follow all the debate, but I tend not to agree with the opinion that "Items of readily provable fact, such as that Perreault is a Hall of Famer or the years during which he was named an All-Star, are already cited in the general references and the external link and do not require a cloud of jarring inline citations." I am from Greece, and I know nothing about him, so this stuff for me is not "readily provable fact". I need verifiable sources, convincing me that everything you state and assume is accurate.--Yannismarou 11:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)