Wikipedia:Peer review/2005 WWE Draft/archive1

2005 WWE Draft[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think this article has FL potential, and I would like it to be reviewed for any concerns or problems, so it can have a better chance at WP:FLC.

Thanks, S R X 16:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 02:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Nikki * For the Draft Lottery, it might be a good idea to subdivide the Notes into Date, Show, Location, and Notes.--SRX^--^Latino Heat 13:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea of an infobox. Maybe with information like total number of trades, date it started, date finished, and links to the previous and following year's trades (like the PPVs in the PPV infobox). Those are just random examples, but you get the idea. What do you think?
- It was established at WT:PW, not to.--SRX^--^Latino Heat 13:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* In the lead: announcers and commentators shouldn't be cap; June shouldn't be linked; the "-" in June 6-30 should be changed to a "–" * Background: don't start a sentence with however, don't link June; the draft is written as Draft Lottery and draft lottery (should it be cap or not? be consistent) * All the dates in the table with day/month/year should be linked, even if they are already. That way if someone changes the order with the sort function, the top date is still linked.--SRX^--^Latino Heat 13:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Hope that helps! Nikki311 23:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]