Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles[edit]

The grand majority of the articles were made by the user, or the user came after the article to put on the list. The page is contrary to "An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of" (Wikipedia:An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 23:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: On the contrary, it is a good notice to editors about potential issues with COIs and BLP.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We don't have a simple rule like notability to guide us here, but I think the article is useful, especially, as Jasper Deng argues, in identifying COI. Msnicki (talk) 23:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A resource supportive of the community. Editors who are independently notable is something for both them and the rest of us to be proud of. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all the above. Wikipedia:An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of is an essay, not policy or even a guideline. There is no valid policy reason to delete this page. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep (WP:SK#1) - failure to state a claim per Nihonjoe. Also, a "normal Keep" per Jasper Deng and SmokeyJoe. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 11:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Self-adding is preferable. If WP:OUTING applies, Wikipedia:Oversight is available. Dru of Id (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jasper Deng. Jonathunder (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Whenaxis about | talk 00:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Longstanding page, informative, and interesting. -- œ ^™ 03:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.