Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani cinema

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus is leaning in this direction. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani cinema[edit]

Wikiproject that has only ever had one real member, banner is placed at no page, it doesn't appear to have had any activity as a wikiproject. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - A one-man show shouldn't be considered a WikiProject. GraYoshi2x►talk 18:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Most projects are moribund in my experience but deletion is not appropriate as this topic area does not not seem especially obscure and so might easily attract more editors. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I forgot to mention that it can also be marked with {{inactive}} if it is deemed that it is viable, or {{historical}} if its work was absorbed by other wikiproject. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and mark as inactive. This way it may attract a few editors who can then revive it. Build it and they will come. Hopefully of course. Dr.K. logos 19:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tag as inactive, or historical, or redirect if redundant to something else. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Normally I would agree with those who call for it to be kept and marked as historical, but in this case there does not appear to have been any activity on the project beyond creating it and inviting a number of users, who apparently did not participate. So I wonder if it might be better to let others start from scratch in the future? Really not sure, hence my comment rather than a !vote. --RL0919 (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will leave a note to the participants in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Small Pakistan wikiprojects, and a note in Pakistan wikiproject. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No activity whatsoever, project had only one member and never did anything; no history worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 00:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Inactive, and basically redundant to Wikipedia:WikiProject Films, which could always recreate as a task force if there were sufficient cause or interest. John Carter (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.