Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Twinkle (2nd nomination)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Use RedWarn instead. (non-admin closure) —GMX^{^(ping!)} 00:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Twinkle[edit]

Too confusing. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I twinkle and twinkle, but yet have to find a little star. Is it up above the world so high? Like a diamond in the sky? Not much can be found in sources, I'm afraid... A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 19:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support What is the use of Twinkle if I can revert the entire RecentChanges feed with RedWarn? RedWarn is addicting. Toadspike (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @PerryPerryD: This is showing up under the regular WP:MfD page, please fix it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.