Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep : Delete . (I deliberately sat this one out so I could say that.) Arguments on both sides were better. The next admin is hereby empowered to do what would normally be done in these cases, which I believe is to do nothing. Also the subject page will be promoted to an essay. Non-Jimbo close. JJB 08:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC) {{essay}}

This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy .

Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page.

You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to Deletion .MFD

Maintenance use only: Place either {{mfd}} or {{mfdx|2nd}} on the page nominated for deletion. Then subst {{subst:mfd2|pg=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales|text=...}} to create the discussion subpage. Finally, subst {{subst:mfd3|pg=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales}} into the MfD log. Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing {{subst:MFDWarning|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales}} ~~~~ on their talk page(s).

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales[edit]

This is a serious nomination, this nomination is a ridiculous distraction. Delete as per WP:NOTMYSPACE Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you are saying this nomination is a ridiculous distraction? KnightLago (talk) 04:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Made me spit up my drink. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 04:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You know... people who learn English as a foreign language sometimes don't get the difference between "this" and "that" darkweasel94 (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm at a loss for words. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - per noduh. J.delanoy : Chat 04:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keepz but den deleet dis wun - Dis iz srs distraction frum srs mfd bzness. Mr.Z-man 04:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
mother-whating bzness?... - jc37 04:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the beard - Per W. G. Grace. Lucifer (Talk) 04:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Oh come on" keep. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 04:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good one, Ipatrol. Well done -- hilarious! You had me until I saw the multiple sigs. -- Noroton : Chat 04:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, he accidentally signed using two signatures. I think he only meant to put one on. I "fixed" it for him. He may well have been serious. --Deskana, Champion of the Frozen Wastes 04:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Meh, it's been a good run. Would anyone else like to take over as founder? --Jimbo Wales (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, put that on the wrong page. but seriously (ok, not seriously), keep for the sake of the day Valley2city^‽ 05:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Fred G. Sanford. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 06:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until tomorrow, when nobody will mind deleting it anyway. tleSif (atlk) 08:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eat iMatthew : Chat 10:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per April F001.--Jimmy xu wrk (talk) 12:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — for great justice and epic lulz. Cheers, Jack Merridew : Chat
Strong Keep - And take the stick out. It's April Fool's Day. Nutiketaiel (talk) 14:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's an April Fool's joke. Tomorrow morning close it and mark it as historical so it won't be repeated another year. (wait, this nomination is also a April Fool's joke? o_O ) --Enric Naval (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy nonsense. Computerjoe 's talk 14:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep bc i luv u GlassCobra 14:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough mainspace edits yet. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This kind of silliness and fun-having must be quashed at all costs. Delete and block all editors who participated in that terrible thing! I are serious fox... this are serious encyclopedia 15:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and let User:Rogers Cadenhead mess with it. --Natural R_X 18:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete. DHowell (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question: So if Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales votes to delete User:Jimbo Wales and this deletes that does that mean it all gets deleted? --can dle •wicke 19:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete April Fools Day - an obvious cabal conspiracy. Dinoguy1000 : Chat 19:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.