Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Boilerplate text

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, mark as historical. Xoloz 16:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Boilerplate text[edit]

This page served as a collection of boilerplate text but since the "explosion of templates and wiki syntax" it became useless and inactive and has become a disambig page with unrelated links. CG 13:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I stopped counting after 2000 inbound links. Keep. But perhaps we should discuss on that article's Talk page whether or not this page should be tagged with {{historical}} for the reasons given in this nomination. Rossami (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think Rossami has it right. Kep and mark as historical. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 19:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Me two. Keep and mark as historical. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. However, it possibly either needs marking as historical or editing to have a more consistent topic. --ais523 09:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, could we org it or cleanup rather than mark historical? KillerChihuahua^?!? 12:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.