Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (3rd nomination)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: April fools day is over (non-admin closure) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are Too many problems with this article

This article is unenclyopedic
Just not notsble
Fails WP:NPOV and WP:GNG
No assertion of notability
This article has a 1/5 rating on trustme.com
The article is still under construction
I don't like it
Who cares about this article
Its useless so might as well delete
Forcing people to do stuff is very harmful
This article is funny obiviously not fit for an unencylopedia
Besides what does this joke even mean
Its just text
This article is just plain rubbish
No references
Nobody works on this article so no will care about it
Only 1k views per 30 days not enough
No one i know has heard of this guideline
This is purley just a crystal ball
Never occured in real life
No body has added sources
Articles like this have probably been deleted in the past as well
Lets get rid of this nonsense^{[April Fools!]} ; User:NotOrrio User talk:NotOrrio - 01:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Send to MfD. Not·Really·Soroka 02:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
done NotOrrio (talk) 02:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.