Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki[edit]

I found this by viewing Special:WhatLinksHere/User:MJL/sandbox1 while looking for this. I'm more than a little unnerved by one of my sandboxes being found in a book labeled "How To Wiki" by a now confirmed sockpuppeteer. Honestly, I am also slightly concerned as well about what this list of pages/users is actually supposed to mean. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the work of a sockpuppeteer, and for other reasons. It can't do any good, since Books don't work, anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The pages created by this account should be reviewed as possible undisclosed paid editing, but that isn't within the scope of this MFD. ~~I am not bundling any of this account's pages in at this time.~~ Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The editor created another useless book. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Add more stuff. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to User:MJL - I also have no real idea what this sockpuppeteer is trying to do, but we might as well delete this stuff. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon: It's sufficiently spooky for me to justify deleting all. I'm not sure I ever want to find out what they were up to tbh. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The following is the userpage of a sockpuppet of this user. This page was edited from both the senior and the junior accounts.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is spam. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 04:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.