Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cyberoidx/cbvsreal
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Withdrawn. Real96 06:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Cyberoidx/cbvsreal[edit]
Violates WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, and WP:POINT. I talked to the user about his userpage violating some policies concerning images, (i.e. fair use). I also talked to the user about attributing the talk page design to me, and the conversation can be recorded here. Real96 15:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with talk archives - Theres no need to delete the page. Shift the page to the talk page archive to reflect the fact that they are, in fact, remnants of a talk page convo. I don't really see anything to suggest violation of WP:POINT. Indeed, both editors are acting a little childish - as editors we own no rights to what we have in our userspace, so taking inspiration from another editor's userspace isn't thievery. Again, etiquette says we should thank them, but there are dozens of userpages copied and/or inspired from each other on a daily basis, and thank yous aren't always exchanged. To squabble over such a minor issue is a waste of time for such an experienced editor like Real96. To waste time over such things when zie should be learning the ropes is disappointing in the case of a newbie Cyberoidx. Just merge and redirect the page, and get it over with. xC | ☎ 16:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, however according to the topic "Cb versus Real" implies that the subject is trying to make a battleground over an issue which is irrelevant to the encyclopedia. In addition, the subject's lists "what I learnt is a clear violation of attack, especially the last line. The talk archives need to reflect the actual stated discussion and not a mocking of an incident, because we are here to build an encyclopedia. Real96 17:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete but archive discussion. I do not think the commentary is necessary at the bottem of the page and the title of the page itself is also unecessary. Clearly a disagreement has occured between the two users, best to archive the discussion appropriately for future reference. Orfen User Talk | Contribs 18:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have removed the commentary at the bottom, and the page will serve as its own archive, so that it doesn't mess with the rest of my talks, which actually have a meaning. I'd really like to point out somethings, 1) It seems Real has forgotten that page history exists, and had been clearng her talk page, when ever i wrote something. Now to prove her point, she has brought them back to her talk page. Anyone who checks the history of her talk page will figure this out. 2) she claims to have fixed my page regarding copyrght issues, but what she missed to point out was that the page had already been fixed by user WODUP (again check history of my talk page) 3) Along with the fix, she added credits to my page, claiming them as another fix. 4) She asks for attribution, but i suppose GFDL is dirrefent from attribution. 5) Adding a special heading on Copying and adding my name seems to be a personal attack, as my far as my personality goes. I really dont know who is less civil. I request someone to tell her to remove that part of her page.
- Keep. I really don't see how this could be an attack, unless real96 didn't say those things or it's somehow misleading, which she doesn't seem to be claiming. Demi T/C 19:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy I and real seem to have talked this out, an i shall be requesting it for speedy myself. CyberoidX 05:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.