Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:(chubbstar)/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:(chubbstar)/sandbox[edit]

Useless subpage not edited for a year, serves only to preserve deleted article The Game (game) and other stuff. -Nard 19:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Who's to say I'm not planning on coming back to some of this material later? I've gone away to school and Wikipedia editing as a hobby has fallen on to a back burner. I'm not necessarily opposed to deletion seeing as I can't imagine coming back to this material anytime soon, that is, if it is indeed actually necessary for the good of Wikipeida. I however do not think that material I wish to save for my convenience is really being that much of a burden on Wikipeida. The material present is clearly for future editing purposes and not unrelated non-Wikipeida content. Also, I find your presumption that it is "useless" quite unnecessary, presumptuous and perhaps even offencive. I would like it if you refrained from such negatively qualifying language in the future as you are meant to represent a welcoming and democratic website. Thank you. (chubbstar)^{— talk | contrib | 18:12, December 8, 2007 (EST)}

Note - Wikipedia is not a democracy ~~and it sure as Hell isn't welcoming!~~--WaltCip (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep User's comments provide an adequate rationale for letting him maintain access to the material. There are several items disorganized on the page, so you can't point to one particular purpose for its existence. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 06:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - The page is clearly a sandbox and serves as a depository for old works and works in progress. In addition, the user has even gone so far as to dewikify the text, thereby ensuring that no one mistakes it for an article. And on a slightly related note, I just lost the game. --jonny-m t 03:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.