Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Inland Empire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . Consensus is that given its level of completeness (as opposed to being two lines and a broken infobox) and the lack of community consensus to delete or otherwise do away with portals, there is no reason to delete or redirect. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Inland Empire[edit]

Defunct. Unedited since 2015. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 22:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete portals should all be deleted. They are a really bad idea, so 1990s Legacypac (talk) 11:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Portals should not be deleted, they are Wikipedia history. Discuss at Wikipedia_talk:Portal#Portals_are_moribund. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until/unless a much wider discussion about portals has taken place. This one has enough content to be a reasonable introduction to Wikipedia's coverage of the topic. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As noted by John of Reading and SmokeyJoe, a consensus on if and how to deprecate portals should be developed. VQuakr (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.