Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Jeffwang
Jeffwang user pages[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was snow-delete; user does not wish to participate in discussion and consensus is extremely clear. — The Earwig (talk) 01:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- User:Jeffwang/censor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Jeffwang/censor/Human penis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
There are plenty of places to start your own censored version of Wikipedia, but on WP itself is definitely not one of them. Pages violate WP:NOT#CENSORED and would never be accepted into mainspace, thus will forever remain here. Black Kite (t) (c) 21:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:NOTWEBHOST. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete WP:FORK if you want, but not on Wikipedia itself. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This doesn't help to build an inclusive free encyclopedia, which is the only goal of this website. A censored version of wikipedia should be a website of its own, hosted somewhere else. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as above, this is clearly covered by WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:NOTWEBHOST. GiantSnowman 21:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete while noting meta:Image filter referendum. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 22:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per fork, notcensored, notwebhost Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:09, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Not a personal webspace, yes. The username is wonderfully ironic, though. Tarc (talk) 01:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - The user's ID ("wang") suggests that this is all a subtle joke of some kind. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I believe, as does consensus, that Wikipedia should be censored through the biased application of user-created rules, not openly and with a stated objective. Have a nice day. Dekkappai (talk) 03:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Go forth and censor the real world elsewhere. WP:FORK And take your baggage too. WP:NOTWEBHOST Phearson (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Speedily Please --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 08:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - pathetic little joke in violation of WP:POINT. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Snowball delete obvious WP:POINT violation. Kill it with fire already. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.