Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tron (cryptocurrency)
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2018 December 14. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Tron (cryptocurrency)[edit]
- Draft:Tron (cryptocurrency) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Draft:Tron.network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page removed from mainspace twice as promotional. Does not solve the issues at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRON (cryptocurrency). Also when evaluating sources consider the new info about paid promotion in the press raised at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Time_for_a_review_of_all_cryptocurrency_articles creator blocked for spam. Legacypac (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly Promotional and a violation of Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies Bkissin (talk) 20:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRON (cryptocurrency). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Qualifies for G4, but we are here, so delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Salt in both draft space and article space, in both title case and block caps. (Salting seems to be case-sensitive and sometimes gamed by changing the case, so salt all varieties.) (If you run out of NaCl, use CaCl2 or KI or whatever.) Robert McClenon (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Added Draft:Tron.network. Delete all and salt using MediaWiki:Titleblacklist per above. MER-C 14:05, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I find it quite upsetting that this article was created as such promotional content. While small, I'm sure a more legitimate article could have been drafted instead. Dr-Bracket (talk) 02:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.