Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Juan A. Figueredo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Juan A. Figueredo[edit]

Non-notable, no assertion of notability, no sourcing whatsoever Orange Mike | Talk 22:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question I assume this will eventually just get rejected and G13 will take care of it. Does it need to be handled more swiftly? I've seen worse drafts. While it's copypasta, I can't find the source so G11 won't work. Star Mississippi 01:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Copypasta? Do you mean G12? SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry. Commenting too late. Star Mississippi 00:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Needed declining or rejecting, and was declined. A good case has been made for deleting this article, except that it isn't an article. Notability and verifiability are not reasons to delete drafts because they can be taken care of in draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to User:Star Mississippi - It appears that you accidentally deleted the {{MFD}} tag; I have restored it. I have seen tags removed many times; it is rare to see them removed by good-faith error, which this clearly was. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! Clearly didn't see it appended to the creator's sig. Thanks for fixing! Star Mississippi 00:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As an unsourced BLP. WP:BLP should apply in all namespaces. Without sources, anything can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Even if correct, allowing unsourced material encourages citogenesis, and for BLPs this is very bad. “Unsourced BLP” should be BLPPRODable even in draftspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - On principle I will vote keep on MFDs for drafts. If deletion was necessary, it would be done through G13.--WaltCip-(talk) 16:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The deletion rationale, while fine for articles, doesn't really apply to drafts. I see no reason not to wait for G13. Pawnkingthree (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, but like, in the same way that pages are kept on a no consensus close. SmokeyJoe's concerns are obviously valid, but this is otherwise entirely a G13 issue. It's hard to decide one way or the other. casualdejekyll 21:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.