Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-03 List of World Heritage Sites in danger
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | List of World Heritage Sites in danger |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Joey80 |
| Parties involved | Joey80 and FatCatIL |
| Mediator(s) | Bduke |
| Comment | FatCatIL reverted his edit, so there now is no dispute |
Mediation Case: 2007-03-03 List of World Heritage Sites in danger[edit]
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
Request Information[edit]
- Request made by: Joey80 02:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- List of World Heritage Sites in danger, Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in danger
- What's going on?
- The dispute is related to the status of Jerusalem (i.e. whether it is part of Israel or not). FatCatIL keeps on reverting that IT IS part of Israel. However, taking into account the nature of the article and the official/objective stand where it was taken from, the status has yet to be settled, as what I kept on including in the article (which the other user keeps on ignoring and deleting).
- What would you like to change about that?
- That the article be stated in the neutral, objective point of view. The official website explicitly states Jerusalem as separate, and not part of Israel: [1]
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- Through my talk page.
Mediator response[edit]
Compromise offers[edit]
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
Discussion[edit]
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.