Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-25 CSICOP
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Davkal (talk · contribs) |
| Parties involved | Primarily Davkal (talk · contribs) and KarlBunker (talk · contribs) |
| Mediator(s) | Mike Christie (talk · contribs) |
| Comment | no activity for two months |
Mediation Case: 2006-07-25 CSICOP[edit]
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
Request Information[edit]
- Request made by: Davkal 10:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- CSICOP article Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal --Ideogram 05:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Who's involved?
- Myself and primarily Karl Bunker
- What's going on?
- Several poepl (including Karl) have complained about POV - I am trying to respond to their complaint but Karl is simply reverting every change I make and contributing nothing more - nor will he debate anything on the talk page
- What would you like to change about that?
- I want to improve the article but feel that this cannot be done at present.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- NO, just use talk page on CSICOP
Mediator response[edit]
Clerk notes - this is a re-request from Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-25 CSICOP. CQJ 14:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Discussion ongoing at the talk page. Mike Christie 16:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Requestor has left. Closing case. --Ideogram 07:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Compromise offers[edit]
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
Discussion[edit]
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.