Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/152 mm howitzer M1943 (D-1)/1

152 mm howitzer M1943 (D-1)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted per general consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A GA from 2008. I can't exactly tell if the many paragraphs with no citations are actually uncited or if they have general references (aside from the better source needed and citation needed tag). I will say, however, that the sources cited do not label any page numbers what so ever which makes it quite impossible to verify. Also, I'm not sure if this article is broad enough at all. GA cleanup lists states "Unsourced passages need footnotes ^{[citation needed]} (July 2016), ... (October 2022)" Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist The many uncited paragraphs alone would cause me to quick fail it if I was the reviewer--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - Lots to fix, and no editor has yet volunteered to do this. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:05, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.