Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 April 8

April 8[edit]

File:Le-prince-type-16-cine-camera-projector-1886.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't have fair use template filled out properly, and doesn’t look to be a valid fair use either, and as far as I can tell, not a free image either (was deleted off Commons, which indicates it can't be freely licenced). Also violates WP:NFTABLE by using this non free image in a table, and as a result, also fails WP:NFCC#8, as it doesn't significantly enhance this article about the person. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The website used as the source is a deadlink [1], but archive of it [2] suggests that the website is copyrighted and doesn't provide a date and author for the image. So we cannot presume that copyright has expired on this, and thus it's a non-free image that doesn't meet our non-free image policy. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in favor of CSD F4. Per @Joseph2302, the source page is dead link, and therefore it lacks licensing information. Kys5g^talk! 15:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Le-prince-cameraprojector-type1-mark2-1888.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't have fair use template filled out properly, as doesn't show it meets all WP:NFCC, and also incorrectly claims to be being used in an article about the device, which it isn't. Doesn’t look to be a valid fair use either, and as far as I can tell, not a free image either (was deleted off Commons, which indicates it can't be freely licenced). Also violates WP:NFTABLE by using this non free image in a table, and as a result, also fails WP:NFCC#8, as it doesn't significantly enhance this article about the person. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also the website it's taken from says "Credit © National Science & Media Museum / Science & Society Picture Library -- All rights reserved." So we can't get a free licence for this, as we don't know who/when the image was originally taken, and it appears to be in copyright still. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HarmonyOS 4.0.jpeg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HarmonyOS is not free software, Apache License that is applied to OpenHarmony doesn't apply to OS found in production models. Ahri.boy (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Erroneous reason for deletion. If everybody thinks like you, then how did this image exist on Commons? Kys5g^talk! 04:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Walkmen-The-Rat.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded file still neither an improvement to understanding The Rat (song) nor proof that free text inadequately educates readers about this song. In other words, neither contextually significant nor irreplaceable by free text. George Ho (talk) 03:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Da doo ron ron.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded file still neither an improvement to understanding Da Doo Ron Ron nor proof that free text inadequately educates readers about this song. In other words, neither contextually significant nor irreplaceable by free text. George Ho (talk) 03:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kate Bush The Sensual World Sample.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded file still neither an improvement to understanding The Sensual World (song) nor proof that free text inadequately educates readers about this song. In other words, neither contextually significant nor irreplaceable by free text. George Ho (talk) 03:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clash-(White Man) Palais.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded file still neither an improvement to understanding (White Man) In Hammersmith Palais nor proof that free text inadequately educates readers about this song, despite lyrics in this sample. In other words, neither contextually significant nor irreplaceable by free text. George Ho (talk) 04:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madness - Baggy Trousers.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded file still neither an improvement to understanding the whole song Baggy Trousers nor proof that free text inadequately educates readers about this song. In other words, neither contextually significant nor irreplaceable by free text. Furthermore, sample too long per MOS:SAMPLE, yet even shortened portion still would be neither contextually significant nor irreplaceable. George Ho (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Samples at Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -Fastily 03:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More about individual tracks themselves than the whole album Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2. Unconvinced that the two samples represent the whole album and illustrate what the album is about. In other words, neither of them is contextually significant. George Ho (talk) 05:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clash-Complete Control.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even as de-PRODded file and after replacing prior revision with newer one, I still doubt that this sample is contextually significant to the rock song Complete Control and replaceable by free text, especially when rehearing the sample over and over. I can't think a valid reason that omitting the file from the project would harm the topic understanding, and I don't think hearing what the song sounds like in about twenty seconds is a valid reason to keep this sample. George Ho (talk) 11:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.