Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 September 2

< September 1	September 3 >

September 2[edit]

File:Cyber Towers hyderabad 1997.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Previously published for example on reddit. WP:VRT confirmation of permission would be required. Whpq (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for having unverifiable provenance. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Particle chart Log.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned raster image redundant to the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes (they were created by the same author, so there are no copyright issues. In any case, this is not listed as a source on the vector image's description page). House Blaster^talk 17:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 08:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Born Pink Cover crop.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a "free" version of this artwork present in the article. This non-free version is for alternative versions of the album and the only difference is the background is black. Doesn't satisfy WP:NFCC >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. QuietHere (talk) 23:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Born Pink Digital.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ✗plicit 23:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This artwork is described as "simple shapes". I disaree, the pink shapes at the top of the article are stylised and designed with gradients and shadows sufficient enough to depict a stylisation that required work of a designer. Should be reuploaded as non-free. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. I'm actually pretty sure that's a photograph of some sort of claws/fangs or something, but whatever it is it's definitely not "simple shapes". QuietHere (talk) 23:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BLACKPINK, The Album - JP ver.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One non-free album cover is already present in infobox's main space for an album cover. This album cover is unique to one particular market (Japan). Per WP:NFCC, multiple covers should not be used where they do not add to sufficient understanding of the topic, are not subject to critical commentary etc. It is positioned in the "alternative cover art" field with no critical commentary in the article or sufficient context to why it is warranted. This is a global audience wikipedia. Many artists release unique cover arts for different markets, but without sufficient critical commentary they are not suitable for inclusion on wikipedia. The image could be sufficiently described in text e.g. The Japan cover art features a montage of four images; each of the image features a different member of the band with different hair colours: top left (name) blonde, top right (name) pink, bottom left (name) brunette and bottom right (name) green. As such, additional cover is not required or licensed or suitable per WP:NFCC. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: it's worth keeping in mind that the Japanese version is in a different language and is not exclusive to the Japanese market. Otherwise your points are all fair. QuietHere (talk) 23:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Idnains.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

→→NSFW←← Prank/vandalism image upload. User no longer exists. No specific rule for deletion found. Comes up in certain unrelated Wiki File searches. – ░▒▓ №∶ 71.59.218.160 (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.