Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 28

< November 27	November 29 >

November 28[edit]

File:Toy Plush .jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

c:COM:TOYS. ✗plicit 02:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wade headshot.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photos, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. There are the uploader's last surviving contributions. ✗plicit 03:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not useful autobiographical photos of someone who's not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Ergo, no use keeping these images. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Russgrimm2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photo, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 03:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ancap flag.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Flag of Anarcho-capitalism.svg on Commons. ✗plicit 06:10, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrew videto dreamJobPic-2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, only used in Andrew Videto which was deleted three years ago at AFD. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 06:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rangers FC old logos[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All former logos of the club, so doesn't meet WP:NFCC#8, as contrary to the free use template on the images, it is not the primary means of identifying the club in this article. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural, none of the files were tagged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 15:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LogoFIFASuperstars.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is just text, so should be converted to public domain licence with {{PD-logo}}, and can be transferred to Commons. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 06:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FashionS9110.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The screen is likely copyrighted. Doesn't qualify for fair use because you can take a picture of the device when it is powered off. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.