Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 8

< July 7	July 9 >

July 8[edit]

File:WZTV-DT2 Logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Poor quality image. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looked fine on the computer I drafted it on, but something happened during processing. Will try again. Nate • (chatter) 00:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It now appears properly; don't know what Inkscape did on one PC, but it fixed it on the other. Nate • (chatter) 00:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malik Poster2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused film poster, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free file with no obvious use in the article Malik (film). Salavat (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~as an obvious copyvio.~~ — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say it's a copyright violation. It just doesn't meet our NFCC whereas File:Malik film poster.jpg does. Buffs (talk) 15:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the mislicensing when I called it a copyvio. Won't call a mislicense as such again. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NFCC as another poster is already in use File:Malik film poster.jpg. Buffs (talk) 15:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.