Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 March 21

< March 20	March 22 >

March 21[edit]

File:Jaki Graham - Ain't Nobody.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 May 3. FASTILY 03:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaki Graham - Ain't Nobody.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scala logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In light of the examples cited at commons:Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_States_of_America it seems pretty clear to me that this logo is too simple. Note that there is currently the same logo at Commons with the same title and with the "too simple for copyright" license, so we could simply delete the local version. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This was nominated after I placed the Speedy F8 tag on it. Yes, it's PD-TextLogo. There's no need to let this FFD continue the full seven days, it can be deleted per F8 immediately. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leeds Building Society Passbook.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned about the copyright of the background image/the cover. A photo of a cover is a derivative work of the cover, and it's not clear that the background photo is under a free licence at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo of the Passbook using my phone and on my desk. — Calvin999 11:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nottingham Building Society Passbook.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Logo in the corner does not satisfy PD-text -FASTILY 03:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned about the copyright of the background image/the cover. A photo of a cover is a derivative work of the cover, and it's not clear that the background photo is under a free licence at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo of the Passbook using my phone and on my desk. — Calvin999 11:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the problem is the copyright of the cover, not just that of the photo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the cover doesn't meet threshold of originality—PD-text. b uidhe 08:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The logo on the cover is above TOO. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nokian logo (1865).svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is present on Commons with the claim that it was used in 1865. If that is true - Nokia was established in 1865 but I am not sure about the logo - then it's no longer copyrighted and the local version thus unnecessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the 1865 logo. It features a salmon from the Nokianvirta River. The company was into timber in those days. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geek Toys.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is an identical duplication in Commons. Unnamelessness (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. This file really should be licensed as pd-logo anyway. Salavat (talk) 06:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to Speedy F8 per Salavat. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NUT animation studio logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is an identical duplication in Commons. Unnamelessness (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - I've tagged the file with {{db-commons}}. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hotstar screenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as visual identification - this is not significantly increasing the readers understanding. There would be no reasonable additional commentary to warrant the photo. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. b uidhe 08:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.